113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10292207)
1. Evaluation of medical equipment on the basis of users' experiences and hazard registration.
Kolstad A
Health Policy; 1989; 11(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 10292207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM.
Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C
J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical assessment of new devices.
Hamilton C
Perfusion; 2007 May; 22(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 18018395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Serious adverse event reporting in a medical device information system.
Pecoraro F; Luzi D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():834-8. PubMed ID: 21893864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of automated ordering devices in hospital purchasing.
Young S
Hosp Mater Manage; 1987 Sep; 12(9):13-5. PubMed ID: 10284212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rational product evaluation.
Larson E; Maciorowski L
J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):31-6. PubMed ID: 3637222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical device accident reporting: does it improve patient safety?
Nobel JJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():29-35. PubMed ID: 10172828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.
Alder HC
Hosp Technol Ser; 1993 Oct; 12(11):1-27. PubMed ID: 10129209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximizing purchase decision factors other than price.
Berkowitz DA; Diamond JF; Montagnolo AJ
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 May; 13(4):27-41. PubMed ID: 10117378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evacuation support system for improved medical documentation and information flow in the field.
Walderhaug S; Meland PH; Mikalsen M; Sagen T; Brevik JI
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Feb; 77(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 17324620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality assurance of technical medical equipment. Report from a research department].
Gisvold SE
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jan; 111(3):349-50. PubMed ID: 2000623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Assessment of service life of sophisticated medical equipment].
Toporkov AA
Med Tekh; 2007; (3):26-33. PubMed ID: 17598479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MD Buyline builds database for product evaluation.
Brightbill T
Hosp Mater Manage; 1988 May; 13(5):8, 10. PubMed ID: 10287886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A vision for the use of ICT by Norwegian Healthcare in 2012.
Glück E; Bergstrøm R; Melleby OF; Gabin J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():617-22. PubMed ID: 18487799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marketing medical devices in Japan.
Ohashi J
Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(1):32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10176143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical video systems.
Health Devices; 1995 Nov; 24(11):428-74. PubMed ID: 8750067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Materials management information systems.
Health Devices; 1996; 25(2-3):48-100. PubMed ID: 8655344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User reporting of medical device related incidents.
Sievänen H
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 12774575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Requirements specification for a harmonized medical device vigilance information exchange system.
Vassilacopoulos G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 28():39-44. PubMed ID: 10172829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
