BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10292478)

  • 1. Capital equipment requests: a formal review process.
    Fagan AE
    Hosp Trustee; 1989; 13(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 10292478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating technology assessment into the capital budgeting process.
    Watts D; Finney DL; Louie B
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Feb; 47(2):20-4, 26, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10145749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technology assessment taking center stage in capital equipment acquisition process.
    Werner C
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1993 Mar; 18(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 10124669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technology assessment and equipment management: a practical approach to cost reduction.
    Franklin JD; Altman D
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996; 14(6):16-9. PubMed ID: 10159337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician budget committee helps control capital equipment costs.
    Keith JM
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Jan; 65(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 10264659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ranking capital projects--an allocation plan.
    Katz BH
    Hospitals; 1980 Sep; 54(18):99-100, 102, 104. PubMed ID: 7399466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Major equipment purchases: a committee approach.
    Fodor J
    Health Prog; 1988 Nov; 69(10):12, 14. PubMed ID: 10290821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Purchasing plays first-string on AHA's TEAM.
    Fritz LR
    Purch Adm; 1979; 3(10):5-7, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10244524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing technology assessment and acquisition.
    Sprague GR
    Healthc Exec; 1988; 3(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 10302988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing an assessment process for new technologies.
    Fine A
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 May; 57(5):84-7. PubMed ID: 12772339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What price progress? Technology assessment teams field requests--and politics.
    Taylor KS
    Health Facil Manage; 1995 Feb; 8(2):20, 22-4. PubMed ID: 10139798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'TEAM' up for technology assessment.
    McKee M; Fritz LR
    Hospitals; 1979 Jun; 53(11):119-20, 122. PubMed ID: 428936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technology assessment.
    Schechter MT; Birnbaum D
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1989; 7(8):66-8. PubMed ID: 10296416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound $ management involves MD's.
    Azzara MW
    Health Care Week; 1978 Nov; 2(19):24. PubMed ID: 10239274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Managing the product standardization process.
    Mauro C
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Mar; 13(3):20-2, 24-5. PubMed ID: 10154862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capital equipment group brings materials management into the loop.
    McCormack J
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):44. PubMed ID: 10139949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Financial considerations in technology assessment.
    Sussman JH
    Top Health Care Financ; 1991; 17(3):30-41. PubMed ID: 2028464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The capital budget: a case study in physician involvement.
    Azzara MW
    Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Apr; 8(4):10-5. PubMed ID: 10241368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HFMA roundtable. Capital planning: how strategic is your organization?
    Frederick C; Lux RH; Morris J; O'Connell B; Wiest J; Fincher N
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):suppl 1-4 following 32. PubMed ID: 16869319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formal equipment buying plans are common, but not at small hospitals.
    Mod Healthc; 1983 Oct; 13(10):118, 120. PubMed ID: 10299317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.