These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10292498)

  • 21. CEO performance review: a board responsibility.
    Doody MF; Fish L
    OH; 1980 May; 24(5):8-11. PubMed ID: 10246456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer.
    Harvey JD
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1978; 23(2):5-21. PubMed ID: 10306901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guidelines for evaluating department managers.
    Schoenhard WC
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):60-2. PubMed ID: 689658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
    Scott S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The health care management triad: MBO, performance appraisal and compensation.
    Appelbaum SH
    Health Care Superv; 1983 Jan; 1(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 10261581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating your chief executive officer.
    Health Care (Don Mills); 1984 Oct; 26(7):24-5. PubMed ID: 10268628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Board oversight of executive performance and compensation.
    Curran CR; Totten MK
    Nurs Econ; 2010; 28(5):343-5, 355. PubMed ID: 21158257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New dimensions in board-CEO relations.
    Alexander J; Brooks DC
    Trustee; 1986 Jun; 39(6):24-7. PubMed ID: 10277005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Putting teeth into pay-for-performance programs.
    Jones DW; Hauser MC
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1991 Sep; 45(9):32, 34, 36 passim. PubMed ID: 10145492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incentive pay plans boost managers' performance.
    Biggs DP
    Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):60-2, 74. PubMed ID: 10280978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How does your CEO measure up?
    Thompson K
    Hosp Trustee; 1985; 9(6):5-6, 21. PubMed ID: 10274423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pay for performance: what trustees should be applauding.
    Hawthorne G
    Trustee; 2000; 53(7):8-14, 1. PubMed ID: 11785231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A method of work performance appraisal at the Pediatric Department in Levoca].
    Ivicic L; Kacejová R
    Cesk Pediatr; 1987 Mar; 42(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 3581272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing supervisors' self-evaluations to their administrators' evaluations.
    Waldman DA; Thornton GC
    Med Group Manage; 1979; 26(1):22, 24, 58. PubMed ID: 10240188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A different approach to merit increases.
    Fleuter DL
    Pers J; 1979 Apr; 58(4):225-6, 262. PubMed ID: 10241466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Executive performance.
    Sloan S
    Trustee; 1985 Nov; 38(11):12, 14-5. PubMed ID: 10274343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Talking pay policy pays off.
    Petrie DJ
    Superv Manage; 1979 May; 24(5):2-13. PubMed ID: 10241568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.