These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10292566)
1. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society? Rothenberg KH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Jan; (143):7-34. PubMed ID: 10108913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Nov; 9(5):7-30. PubMed ID: 10284752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court to examine withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Costa L Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 Jan; 13(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10113080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases. Hafemeister TL Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Past and present. Closing the circle on the right to die. Linenthal AJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1993; 56(1):46. PubMed ID: 8434045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jul; (137):7-38. PubMed ID: 10105837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to refuse medical treatment: where there is a right, there ought to be a remedy. Wilborn SE North KY Law Rev; 1998; 25(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 16437814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clarifying who decides. Hollister DC Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10103559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial feeding and patients' rights: recent developments and recommendations. Cohen EN; Cohen MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(3):23-35. PubMed ID: 10312561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to document refusal of procedures to sustain life. Murray CD; Birn SW Provider; 1986 Oct; 12(10):39-40. PubMed ID: 10279110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody. Savage T; Michalak DR Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli. Kramer IR John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling. Olson EG Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Between life and death lies dignity. Gasner R Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]