BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10292891)

  • 1. Initial clinical experience with computed radiography imaging in an emergency department.
    Milos MJ; Aberle DR; Baraff LJ; Gold RH; Scanlan RL; Bassett LW
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Jan; 18(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10292891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tale of two CRs: hospital conducts side-by-side test.
    Fawver SD
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 12800561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
    Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital film processing: a comparison of wet and dry processing methods.
    Health Devices; 1998 Aug; 27(8):293-8. PubMed ID: 9743901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparing a business justification for going electronic.
    Ortiz AO; Luyckx MP
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 11857990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
    Sack D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted interpretation in radiographic diagnosis.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):683-96. PubMed ID: 8224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital imaging system are rapidly introduced in Swedish departments of radiography. This calls for new strategic planning].
    Laurin S; Norberg KA
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4600-1. PubMed ID: 11107746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CR/DR systems: what each technology offers today; what is expected for the future.
    Gallet J; Titus H
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 16475561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.