These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10293006)
1. Returning the queen of the professions to eminence--an enhancement of peer review. Sharp JR J Qual Assur; 1989; 11(2):4-9. PubMed ID: 10293006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assessment and quality assurance in medical care. Sanazaro PJ Annu Rev Public Health; 1980; 1():37-68. PubMed ID: 6753865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding differing methods. Fotenos A; Nagy P J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):929-30. PubMed ID: 23206652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review. Thompson RE Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standards for peer evaluation: the hospital quality assurance committee. Feldman SE; Roblin DW Am J Public Health; 1992 Apr; 82(4):525-7. PubMed ID: 1546768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical malpractice and quality of care. Waxman HA N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):943-4. PubMed ID: 3821842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Congress moves to bolster peer review: the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. Iglehart JK N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):960-4. PubMed ID: 3821850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective peer review at Brooke Army Medical Center. Zaloznik AJ; Montgomery RM Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1992; 12(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10116283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Relating quality assurance to credentials and privileges. Gilbert B QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 May; 10(5):130-5. PubMed ID: 6429598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of hospital peer review. Board of Trustees, American Medical Association. QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):3. PubMed ID: 10114869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Observation: a useful tool or a relic from the past? Pearson JW Hawaii Med J; 1988 Aug; 47(8):369-71, 389. PubMed ID: 3170180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Compensation and accountability: the way to improve peer review. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1603859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services and the implications for education in quality assessment: Part IV. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Nov; 5(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 2136677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box. Scott C Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospitals and the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Darr K Hosp Top; 1990; 68(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10105901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician. Curtis T Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The real deal on holding successful case reviews. Spath P Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):145-8. PubMed ID: 17957886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]