These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10293006)
21. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Medicolegal issues arising in the emerging mandated health data disclosure era. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Aug; 3(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 2980939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Formal assessment-- springboard for continuing education. Wilson LL Med J Aust; 1981 Jun; 1(12):609-10. PubMed ID: 7254046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Correcting the practice styles of errant physicians. Sharp JR Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10112654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality improvement, credentialing, and competency. Bozadjian EM Int Anesthesiol Clin; 1999; 37(4):47-57. PubMed ID: 10614017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Legally permissible uses of mandated health data disclosure. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Nov; 3(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 2980945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Achieving clinical improvements through gainsharing. Med Manag Netw; 1998 Dec; 6(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10345252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Committee dynamics. Part I. Medical staff committees--you are entering the "twilight zone". Shampain P QRC Advis; 1989 May; 5(7):1-6. PubMed ID: 10292903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Adverse clinical event peer review must evolve to be relevant to quality improvement. Maddox TM; Rumsfeld JS Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Nov; 7(6):807-8. PubMed ID: 25387776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Confidentiality and quality assurance. Williams R Health Law Can; 1990; 10(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 10113115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Lung cancer peer review survey. Beckett PA Thorax; 2008 Mar; 63(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 18308968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The "Medical Peer Review" curriculum of the German Medical Association]. Chop I Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(8):555-9. PubMed ID: 23084860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Physician gainsharing: a model for implementing best practices. Peck C Med Manag Netw; 1998 Dec; 6(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 10345251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Systems versus performance problems: a peer review organization's perspective. Brooks JH; Renz KK; Richardson SL; White S; Hosey J QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1992 May; 18(5):172-7. PubMed ID: 1298211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Work with physicians on core measures: here's how. Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Dec; 32(12):166, 171-2. PubMed ID: 18232291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Corporate liability: you are the best defense. Hirsh HL Physicians Manage; 1985 May; 25(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 10271661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical staff motivation and peer review. Merry MD Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):21-31. PubMed ID: 10268842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer-assested clinical review in an Australian pediatric hospital. Mather BS QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):7-13. PubMed ID: 6806741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Take these steps for noncompliant physicians. Work with, not against, physicians. Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Dec; 32(12):164-6. PubMed ID: 18232290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]