1206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10293152)
21. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' Indicator Measurement System. Health care outcomes database.
McGreevey C; Nadzam D; Corbin L
Comput Nurs; 1997; 15(2 Suppl):S87-94. PubMed ID: 9099042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implications of the Indicator Measurement System.
Kennedy M
Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1994 May; 6(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10134524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The next evolution in accreditation.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(5):2-3. PubMed ID: 10166297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Herding stats: the quality measurement dilemma.
Vavala D
Physician Exec; 1995 Aug; 21(8):5-9. PubMed ID: 10144550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Despite cost and risk, ORYX PLUS offers benchmarking bonanza.
Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Feb; 5(2):13-8. PubMed ID: 10177993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meeting the Joint Commission's information management planning standard: a primer and example.
Ricord LC
Top Health Inf Manage; 1995 May; 15(4):44-54. PubMed ID: 10142453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An approach to measuring and comparing performance and improvement in hospitals.
Coldiron JS
Med Health R I; 2001 Nov; 84(11):356-60. PubMed ID: 12355662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance measures required, but which ones? Joint Commission flexible on chosen measures.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Dec; 20(12):173-6. PubMed ID: 10152525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Joint Commission and the Agenda for Change.
Jurkiewicz MJ
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1988 Nov; 73(11):20-5. PubMed ID: 10302922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Progress continues on quality improvement database project.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(11-12):4-5. PubMed ID: 10313795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Approved: The Joint Commission's hospital performance measurement implementation plan through 2008.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Mar; 27(3):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 17416141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Standards development addresses quality improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(11-12):1, 4. PubMed ID: 10313793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Joint Commission's hospital accreditation recognized by CMS.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 Jan; 30(1):1, 11. PubMed ID: 20108786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Information management and quality improvement: the Joint Commission's perspective.
Schyve PM; Kamowski DB
Qual Manag Health Care; 1994; 2(4):54-62. PubMed ID: 10137608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rehabilitation in home care: new Joint Commission accrediting standards.
Grotke DM
Home Healthc Nurse Manag; 2000; 4(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 16649312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Many changes in JCAH standards affect pharmacy department.
Rhomberg MA
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Mar; 37(3):430, 432, 434. PubMed ID: 6929159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An important new challenge facing health care marketers.
Lamb CW
J Health Care Mark; 1988 Sep; 8(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 10289935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Management of information: analysis of the Joint Commission's standards for information management.
Bradley J
Top Health Inf Manage; 1995 Nov; 16(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 10152478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Articles misconstrue Joint Commission's position on quality improvement.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1992; 12(6):2-3, 13. PubMed ID: 10123607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance measures. How are they developed, validated, and used?
O'Leary DS
Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS13-7. PubMed ID: 7823652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
