201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10293422)
1. Perspectives. Medical effectiveness initiatives.
Glenn KJ
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 May; 43(20):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10293422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research suggests more care, greater expense fails to produce outcome improvements.
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Apr; 8(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 12722597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving clinical decisionmaking as a means of achieving cost-effective medical care.
Kralewski J
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(3):63-4. PubMed ID: 10129403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician, inform thyself. With better data, doctors learn what works--and what doesn't.
Ludtke M
Time; 1989 Jun; 133(26):71. PubMed ID: 10293555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Small area variation in the use of health care resources.
Kralewski J
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 10129388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using diagnostic clusters to evaluate patterns of treatment and develop capitation rates.
Cave DG
Empl Benefits J; 1995 Mar; 20(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 10142516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicine, money, and mathematics.
Eddy DM
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1992 Jun; 77(6):36-49. PubMed ID: 10118543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The RBRVS for psychiatry.
Dorwart RA; Rodriguez E; Causino N
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1993; 14():139-57. PubMed ID: 10164710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraud and abuse safe harbor regulations.
Kepner JC
Del Med J; 1991 Sep; 63(9):575-84. PubMed ID: 1756895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Current issues in profiling quality of care.
McNeil BJ; Pedersen SH; Gatsonis C
Inquiry; 1992; 29(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 1398901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of computerized risk adjustment tools in clinical process improvement.
Thompson DI; French RM
Healthc Inf Manage; 1994; 8(4):45-52. PubMed ID: 10141373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing variations in medical outcomes and practice patterns. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
Wennebert JE
Internist; 1989 Sep; 30(8):16-20, 25. PubMed ID: 10295522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of a severity-adjusted patient data base to establish standards for quality and cost-efficient medical practice.
Mohlenbrock WC
Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(3):41-52. PubMed ID: 10105012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes research: too good to be true.
Hage SJ
Radiol Manage; 1994; 16(3):16-9. PubMed ID: 10136189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AMA and Rand Corp. to establish practice parameters.
Todd JS
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10293500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A glimmer of hope--outcome assessment and practice guidelines in the control of health care costs.
Frenkel M
J Med Pract Manage; 1989; 4(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 10293702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Despite clinical evidence, MDs often choose more costly care.
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Aug; 8(8):94-6. PubMed ID: 12971038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Will the real QA please stand up?
Kazandjian VA
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Jul; 61(7):43-7. PubMed ID: 10105159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data trends. Broadening the use of financial data to improve patient care.
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jun; 56(6):78. PubMed ID: 12061054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Doctors make the difference. Physicians' costs are shown to vary widely: study.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Mar; 36(13):10, 12. PubMed ID: 16617892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
