These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. High Court adds confusion, constraint to abortion issue. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug; 19(34):32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 10294508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court of Appeals rules municipal hospital's abortion ban in unconstitutional. Kaunitz KK Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 10254163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The unmet need for legal abortion services in the U.S. Tietze C; Jaffe FS; Dryfoos JG Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(5):224-30. PubMed ID: 1193220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 1983 Supreme Court abortion decisions: impact on hospitals, a conflict with Baby Doe? Carlson RA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):2-7. PubMed ID: 10263291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Access to abortion in Ontario: from Morgentaler 1988 to the Savings and Restructuring Act. Farid C Health Law J; 1997; 5():119-45. PubMed ID: 10569896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Women slam hospital approach to abortion. Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Jun; 20(6):8. PubMed ID: 10308207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HHS offers Hill-Burton revisions regarding public hospitals. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1985 Sep; 8(19):4-5. PubMed ID: 10272719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The abortion decisions--how will the United States Supreme Court define "necessary". Duffy MA Women Lawyers J; 1978; 64(1):3-16+. PubMed ID: 11664060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion laws will bend under new medical, social pressures. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ Hosp Prog; 1982 Dec; 63(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10257448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contraception and voluntary pregnancy interruption in public hospital establishments. Circular DGS/2A No. 12-82 of 12 October 1982]. Latrille J Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1983; (27-28):61-4. PubMed ID: 6558883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sustaining the prolife momentum: legal and political strategies. Wendel GD; Dunsford JE Hosp Prog; 1982 Dec; 63(12):70-3. PubMed ID: 10257451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]