These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1029390)

  • 1. A federal perspective on the role of the journal and planning to enhance health and well-being.
    Endicott KM
    Am J Health Plann; 1976 Jul; 1(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 1029390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal health care planning: impact on the Student Health Center.
    Bogen GK
    J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1978 Jun; 26(6):293-6. PubMed ID: 690341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
    Gold RB; Sonfield A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspective on priorities.
    Fitzgibbons RP
    N Engl J Med; 1969 Dec; 281(25):1432-3. PubMed ID: 5355471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role and responsibility of a state in promoting good health for its people. Financing of health care: comment.
    McNerney WJ
    Inquiry; 1973 Mar; 10():Suppl 1:6-7. PubMed ID: 4267158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organization and administration for health affairs. Comment: state versus federal health policy.
    Thompson JD
    Inquiry; 1973 Mar; 10():Suppl 1:78-83. PubMed ID: 4267160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A report of federal support for state programs in comprehensive planning for mental retardation.
    Almack RB; Downey JC
    Rehabil Rec; 1971; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 5540654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Program evaluation and better federal programs: overview.
    Scanlon J; Waller J
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1979 Feb; 1(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 10240169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proposed phaseout of federal funds puts planning regulators in turmoil.
    Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):32. PubMed ID: 10250326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health planners fight federal support phaseout.
    Snyder JD; Bale C
    Physicians Manage; 1981 Jul; 21(7):65-7, 71. PubMed ID: 10251864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal influence in the health care system.
    Michael JM; Parsons FL
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1970 Jul; 69(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 5202391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State government financing of health planning.
    Connor GR
    Am J Health Plann; 1976 Oct; 1(2):48-51. PubMed ID: 829396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role and responsibility of a state in promoting good health for its people: financing of health care.
    Falk IS
    Inquiry; 1973 Mar; 10():Suppl 1:1-5. PubMed ID: 4267150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Federal programs affecting medical practice.
    Ryder CF
    J Am Med Womens Assoc; 1969 Jun; 24(6):477-81. PubMed ID: 4241217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The federal role in health: a conversation with Charles C. Edwards, M.D., assistant Secretary for Health, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
    Lesparre M; Edwards CC
    Hospitals; 1973 Sep; 47(18):45-50. PubMed ID: 4361351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Federal health services grants.
    Zwick DI
    Health Serv Rep; 1973 Jan; 88(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 4346941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
    Nestor B; Gold RB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measure aiming to expand family planning introduced in Congress.
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Jun; 2(3):11-2. PubMed ID: 12295188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
    Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.