These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10294036)
41. [Late pregnancy interruption: how tough is the law?]. den Hartogh GA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Mar; 140(11):621-4. PubMed ID: 8649531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Poppema ST MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Gartner EC MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. NOW v. Scheidler: protecting women's access to reproductive health services. Clayton F; Love SN Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):967-97. PubMed ID: 10558500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute. Gough AD Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Aug; (257):9-36. PubMed ID: 11066592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Increase in obstacles to abortion: the American perspective in 2004. Donohoe M J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2005; 60(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16845763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus. Kissling F Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. High Court overturns Dooling decision ruling Hyde constitutional; HHS discontinues Medicaid financing for abortions. Kaunitz K Health Law Vigil; 1980 Jul; 3(15):3-5. PubMed ID: 10297867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. 'Failure to extend the Abortion Act puts the lives of women in Northern Ireland at risk'. Wright J Nurs Times; 2008 Nov 25-Dec 1; 104(47):14. PubMed ID: 19068883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Abortion decision worries public hospital advocates. Tokarski C Mod Healthc; 1989 Jul; 19(27):3. PubMed ID: 10293741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. What are the legal rights of the unborn child? Vernon J Neonatal Netw; 1997 Jun; 16(4):73-4. PubMed ID: 9216327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Abortion on trial, again. Novak V Time; 2000 May; 155(18):38. PubMed ID: 11765507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]