These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Where doctors can't confront peers who accuse them. Harsham P Med Econ; 1985 Sep; 62(18):96-8, 102-6. PubMed ID: 10272848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antitrust law and the medical staff. Holthaus D Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality of peer review records. IMJ Ill Med J; 1984 Dec; 166(6):409. PubMed ID: 6150918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny. LaCava FW Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review splits Calif. medical community. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing. Springer EW Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patrick v. Burget; will the state action doctrine protect bad faith peer review? Healthspan; 1988 Feb; 5(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 10288650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. If you should lose a peer review suit. Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1988 Dec; 65(24):140-4, 147-8, 150-1 passim. PubMed ID: 10290905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review in the wake of Patrick. McCormick B Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent decision leaves gap in peer review discovery protections. Pagano v. Oroville Hospital. Wisch CJ; Penner IE Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]