These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1029439)
1. Arguments for a comprehensive rehabilitation program. Halhuber MJ; König K Bibl Cardiol; 1976; (36):103-13. PubMed ID: 1029439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up study of cardiac patients on a rehabilitation service. Tobis JS; Zohman LR Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1970 May; 51(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 5420015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rehabilitation of the coronary patient. Nixon PG Physiotherapy; 1972 Oct; 58(10):336-8. PubMed ID: 5077698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The rehabilitation of patients with coronary sclerosis]. Visser JF Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1967 Oct; 111(43):1923-7. PubMed ID: 6081967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac rehabilitation: evidence for improvement in myocardial perfusion and function. Froelicher V; Jensen D; Atwood JE; McKirnan MD; Gerber K; Slutsky R; Battler A; Ashburn W; Ross J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Nov; 61(11):517-22. PubMed ID: 7436712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ambulatory rehabilitation facilities in centrally located hospitals for patients with coronary disease]. Schenk KE Med Welt; 1980 Feb; 31(6):212-9. PubMed ID: 6988664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pros and cons of organized rehabilitation. Acker JE Bibl Cardiol; 1976; (36):114-6. PubMed ID: 1029441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Physical and psychological future of patients with coronary disease. To whom should ambulatory rehabilitation be proposed? (author's transl)]. Spinnler MT; Bersier AL; Lasserre B; Righetti A; Chantraine A; Bloch A Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Feb; 11(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 6978481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of a phase II cardiac rehabilitation program performed on an outpatient basis]. Bjarnason-Wehrens B; Benesch L; Bischoff KO; Buran-Kilian B; Gysan D; Hollenstein U; Mayer-Berger W; McCabe M; Wilkniss R; Sauer G Herz; 2003 Aug; 28(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12928739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Position of the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation in Vascular Disease, DGPR on the study under the Health and Pension Insurance Scheme's Recommendation on Outpatient/Inpatient Rehabilitation: A. vom Orde et al., "Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation treatment and cost-effectiveness relations--A comparison between inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation programmes"]. Held K; Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Apr; 43(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 15160704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Panel IV: The pros and cons of organized rehabilitation on the basis of repeated short-tern supervised programmes. Discussion. Bibl Cardiol; 1976; (36):120-4. PubMed ID: 1029443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]