These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10294685)
1. Sara Weddington on Roe v. Wade. Interview by Lee Stockdale. Weddington S Health Matrix; 1989; 7(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 10294685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade. Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade? Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision. Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rewriting Roe v. Wade. Regan DH Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court? Drenning MG Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question. Drenning MG Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade]. Merchant J Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1989 Oct; 321(17):1200-3. PubMed ID: 2677728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A closer look. Conner SL Ala Med; 1990; 60(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 2239628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and the search for public policy. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 8118140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade is constitutionally unprincipled and logically incoherent: a brief in support of judicial restraint. Gerard JB Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2603866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]