403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10294730)
1. "We're not ostriches anymore!".
Schutte JE
Med Econ; 1989 Sep; 66(18):131, 135-6, 139. PubMed ID: 10294730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The AMA's big loss in Congress.
New Physician; 1983; 32(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10258416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The growing battle over doctors selling drugs.
Cassidy R
Med Econ; 1988 May; 65(10):66-9, 72, 79 passim. PubMed ID: 10287484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should the FTC regulate American medicine?
Rial W
Natl J (Wash); 1982 Sep; 14(37):1576-7. PubMed ID: 10256460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lawmakers concur with ACP on key aspects of debate.
Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983; 3(7):3. PubMed ID: 10263084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Why five soloists are suing a big group.
Holoweiko M
Med Econ; 1982 Jun; 59(13):74-8, 79. PubMed ID: 10255677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wilk v. American Medical Association--AMA enjoined from advocating boycott of chiropractors; individual choice endorsed.
Cohen HH
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10286483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Supreme Court rejects case-by-case antitrust analysis in Maricopa.
McCann RW
Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(13):1-4. PubMed ID: 10256005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Antitrust implications for health planning.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1984 May; 39(12):59, 61-2. PubMed ID: 10266793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Competition among physicians. Avoiding anticompetitive activities.
Oliver D
Consultant; 1988 Dec; 28(12):60-1, 68, 73. PubMed ID: 10290553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. District court denies summary judgment on physician's antitrust claim.
Urbanski MF
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Oct; 11(21):5-6. PubMed ID: 10288891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers.
Halper HR
Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospital competition and antitrust: the Federal Trade Commission staff report.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(14):6-10. PubMed ID: 10282648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Market definition, market power, and potential competition.
Horowitz I
Q Rev Econ Bus; 1982; 22(3):23-42. PubMed ID: 10257262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Steering clear of an antitrust charge.
Trombetta WL
Med Econ; 1986 Aug; 63(16):105-9, 112. PubMed ID: 10277667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of quality of health care considerations in antitrust analysis.
Kauper TE
Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):273-340. PubMed ID: 10296906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives. Wakened FTC worries providers.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Apr; 42(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10286492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maricopa aftermath: what is required for a physician group to achieve integration?
Stromberg RE; Goldman JS
Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10269416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Exclusive contracts and hospital privileges--the physician's perspective.
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10285826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient care not enough as defense for provider conduct.
Hammaker MK
Provider; 1987 Dec; 13(12):30-1, 40. PubMed ID: 10285093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
