171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10295360)
1. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Building upon assumptions. An Office of Technology Assessment report examines breast cancer screening for women over 65.
Tsuchiyama S
Adm Radiol; 1991 Sep; 10(9):19-20, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10115528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Promoting health through breast cancer screening.
Sabetti CL
Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 10291947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
Thomas P
Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening and breast cancer: a surgical perspective.
Walt AJ
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1990 Sep; 75(9):6-10. PubMed ID: 10106240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reviewing the AIDS epidemic and cancer screening.
Simmons JC
Internist; 1988; 29(10):11-2, 16. PubMed ID: 10292163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent controversies in mammography screening for breast cancer.
McTiernan A
Medscape Womens Health; 2002; 7(2):3. PubMed ID: 12142859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [What kind of information do German health information pamphlets provide on mammography screening?].
Kurzenhäuser S
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 12669690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening program evaluation project; program announcement and notice of availability of funds for fiscal year 1987--CDC.
Fed Regist; 1987 Aug; 52(167):32608. PubMed ID: 10314244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening-individualized risk assessment and application of new research technology: non-protein bound estradiol and chromosome analysis.
Jackson GL; Pathak S; Jones LA; Vogel V; Kemp KI; Ota DM; Kulkarni P; Vernon S; Conoley P; Hopwood V
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 293():271-8. PubMed ID: 2726940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography and breast cancer.
Pomare EW; Dady P; Marshall B; Glasgow HM
N Z Med J; 1990 Apr; 103(888):192. PubMed ID: 2330173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography screening in women 40 to 49 years old.
Léger MM; McNellis R;
JAAPA; 2007 Nov; 20(11):16, 18. PubMed ID: 18035758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
Lee CH; Weinreb JC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The technical quality of mammography in centers participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program.
Galkin BM; Feig SA; Muir HD
Radiographics; 1988 Jan; 8(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 3353530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance in Trent Regional Health Authority's breast screening programme.
Thornhill P
Radiogr Today; 1990 Apr; 56(635):11-3. PubMed ID: 2363814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
Sandelin K
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: consent for screening.
Baum M
BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):728. PubMed ID: 16565139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
