These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10295639)

  • 1. The right to forego life-sustaining treatment: legal trends and emerging issues.
    Rothenberg KR
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 11(4):480-501. PubMed ID: 10295639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
    Rothenberg KH
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Jan; (143):7-34. PubMed ID: 10108913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tube feeding and advanced progressive dementia.
    Post SG
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11478092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody.
    Savage T; Michalak DR
    Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legacy of Karen Ann Quinlan.
    Angell M
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 8453235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right to die--ethical dilemmas in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Rundquist JM
    SCI Nurs; 2002; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12510497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
    Adamson EH
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health-care decision making. Part I: Legal and ethical principles.
    Grant K; Huntington SR
    Physician Assist; 1989 Jun; 13(6):93, 96, 98 passim. PubMed ID: 10314670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
    Cerminara KL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment.
    Scofield GR
    Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting the right to decide end-of-life treatment.
    Harris S
    Provider; 1986 Oct; 12(10):36-8. PubMed ID: 10279109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarifying who decides.
    Hollister DC
    Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10103559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The right to refuse medical treatment: where there is a right, there ought to be a remedy.
    Wilborn SE
    North KY Law Rev; 1998; 25(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 16437814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An intimate passing: restoring the role of family and religion in dying.
    Boozang KM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1997; 58(3):549-617. PubMed ID: 16086506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
    Mazzeo KE
    Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
    Ouellette AR
    Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide?
    Johnson SH
    Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.