These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Doctors are fighting back against bullying reviewers. Stevens C Med Econ; 1990 Jan; 67(2):25, 28-32. PubMed ID: 10103556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential liability in utilization review. King MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10285831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on. Azebedo D Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential liability in utilization review: the risk grows. King ML Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 10110106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refusing to pay for health care--Part III (of III): Avoiding third-party payer liability. Ross EJ Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1996; 11(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 8878300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Liability implications of utilization review as a cost containment mechanism. Schessler CE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():379-406. PubMed ID: 10118988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization review--managing the reviewers. Solomon CM Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1990; 23(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 10104055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of utilization review liability. Reagan ME Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who'll be liable when a patient is injured? Thomas MC Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):56-8, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10110089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Review firms under review. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(36):98. PubMed ID: 10106189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing the legal risks of PPOs. Vienna AM Personnel; 1986 Mar; 63(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 10276470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court decision echoes cautionary measures on payer liability risk. Corcoran ME Bus Health; 1988 Aug; 5(10):46-7. PubMed ID: 10288830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whodunit? Causal responsibility of utilization review for physicians' decisions, patients' outcomes. Morreim EH Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):40-56. PubMed ID: 1630141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Managed-care entities could be held liable for UR decisions. Hinden RA Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10290607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Should we regulate 'utilization management?'. Field MJ; Gray BH Health Aff (Millwood); 1989; 8(4):103-12. PubMed ID: 2606431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ERISA loophole permits utilization review firms to avoid liability for malpractice. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10183738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice in the State of Hawaii (1979-1984). Mardfin JK Hawaii Med J; 1987 Jan; 46(1):19, 22-3. PubMed ID: 3557953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New developments in managed care litigation. Saue JM Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10294743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]