These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10295774)

  • 1. Clinical pertinence review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Schraffenberger LA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Lewis KS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical record review.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1987; 7(9-10):8-10. PubMed ID: 10289804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical staff monitoring functions: medical record review.
    JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10289639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical pertinence of the medical record.
    Dimond FC
    QRC Advis; 1993 Jul; 9(9):3-5. PubMed ID: 10126961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Documenting clinical findings accurately in postoperative notes.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):7. PubMed ID: 16933548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical record statistics form for hospital surveys modified.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10346339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When medical records are altered or missing.
    Hirsh BD
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1994; 5(6):13-4, 16. PubMed ID: 10139234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practices in record completion.
    Doyon C
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15500017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A closer look at clinical pertinence standards.
    Clark J
    J AHIMA; 2002 Oct; 73(9):91-2. PubMed ID: 12371343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditing medical records helps reduce liability.
    Ganguli G; Winfrey S
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1990 Oct; 44(10):30-5. PubMed ID: 10145322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Charting a course toward legible medical records. Perfect paperwork can mean financial savings, better patient care.
    Weber DO
    Physician Exec; 2002; 28(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 11806236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding unnecessary peer review.
    Nelson KM
    QA Rev; 1991; 3(3):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10115142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Documenting resident education in LTC.
    Feilmann A
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2001 Jul; 17(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 11447896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meeting the most challenging hospital standards.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1999; 19(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 10538769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 1995 survey process update. Review of closed medical records in hospitals has been improved.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1995; 15(2):12. PubMed ID: 10142861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparotomy operative note template constructed through a modified Delphi method.
    Moore L; Churley-Strom R; Singal B; O'Leary S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):e16-7. PubMed ID: 18823873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From check-boxes to bytes: one hospital's transition process.
    Baranda R; Spangler C; Vukson R
    QRC Advis; 1998 Sep; 14(11):5-7. PubMed ID: 10182676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.