204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10296066)
1. MRI quality & success not necessarily equipment dependent.
Longton DM
Adm Radiol; 1989 Oct; 8(10):18-21. PubMed ID: 10296066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI safety is the focus of new Sentinel Event Alert.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Jul; 33(7):97-8. PubMed ID: 19035034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Part two: Implementing a shared quality assurance program.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Mar; 56(3):32-4. PubMed ID: 421982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical considerations for patient investigation using a high field (1.5T) magnetic resonance system.
Ayton VT; Smith MA; Bingham JB
Radiogr Today; 1989 Jan; 55(620):12-5. PubMed ID: 2590410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The MRI decision process.
Di Giacinto TM; Bonito RT; Bauman L
Adm Radiol; 1990 Jan; 9(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10106390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Referrer satisfaction as a quality criterion: developing an questionnaire for measuring the quality of services provided by a radiology department].
Kubik-Huch RA; Rexroth M; Porst R; Dürselen L; Otto R; Szucs T
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15657830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance for MRI. Part one.
Bell RA
Adm Radiol; 1988 Aug; 7(8):18-9, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10288817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hazards of magnetic resonance imaging.
DeLuca SA; Castronovo FP
Am Fam Physician; 1990 Jan; 41(1):145-6. PubMed ID: 2294670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ACR MRI site accreditation. What will its impact be?
Rothschild P
Adm Radiol J; 1997; 16(4-5):19-21. PubMed ID: 10169516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Keeping it safe: MRI site design, operations, and surveillance at an extended university health system.
Lipton ML
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):749-54. PubMed ID: 17411695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI site planning adventures.
Pooley RA; Felmlee JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 17411721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance for MRI. Part two.
Bell RA
Adm Radiol; 1988 Sep; 7(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10290292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat analysis in radiology: a method of quality control.
Dodd BC
Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1983; 14(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 10262102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What are the JCAH's guidelines for reviewing the quality and appropriateness of care provided by support services, such as the radiology department?
Affeldt JE
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):49. PubMed ID: 10309865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moving toward physician accountability in quality assurance.
Thrall JH; Athanasoulis CA
Adm Radiol; 1989 Nov; 8(11):36-9, 41-2. PubMed ID: 10296510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Referrer satisfaction as a quality criterion: developing an questionnaire for measuring the quality of services provided by a radiology department].
Kubik-Huch RA; Rexroth M; Porst R; Dürselen L; Otto R; Szucs T
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 15719307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control issues. Governing the radiation physicist.
Tolbert DD; Hubbard LB; Bushong SC; Khan FM; Payne JT
Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):46-50, 52. PubMed ID: 10294846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Designing a shared radiology quality assurance program.
Lindstrom R
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Jan; 56(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 761723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The economics of mammography quality assurance.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW
Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 10294844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance programs for diagnostic radiology facilities: Food and Drug Administration. Final recommendation.
Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(239):71728-40. PubMed ID: 10244502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
