These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10296083)
21. Is the right to die dead? Samar VJ De Paul Law Rev; 2000; 50(1):221-64. PubMed ID: 12455502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Peters PG Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of families in medical decisions. Minow M Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective. Drane JF Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. U.S. Supreme Court will rule on life support issues. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1989 Oct; 70(8):18, 32. PubMed ID: 10295570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health. Craig P J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling. Olson EG Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan. Hoffmann DE Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "Suicide: a constitutional right?"-- reflections eleven years later. Marzen TJ; O'Dowd MK; Crone D; Balch TJ Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):261-84. PubMed ID: 12385309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A backdoor to policy making: the use of philosophers by the Supreme Court. Rao N Univ Chic Law Rev; 1998; 65(4):1371-401. PubMed ID: 16273694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to assisted suicide and euthanasia. Gorsuch NM Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):599-710. PubMed ID: 12524693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The court upholds a state law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide. Feinberg B J Crim Law Criminol; 1998; 88(3):847-76. PubMed ID: 12455522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life. Prygoski PJ Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective. Saperstein D; Mishkin D CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. Mulholland KC Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Physician-assisted suicide: new protocol for a rightful death. O'Brien CN; Madek GA Neb Law Rev; 1998; 77(2):229-80. PubMed ID: 12769108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]