These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10296506)
21. Whose right to die? The Supreme Court will wrestle with the ultimate question. Sanders AL Time; 1989 Dec; 134(24):80. PubMed ID: 10296083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling. Olson EG Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The patient who wants to die: what to do when rights collide. Gerber PC Physicians Manage; 1987 Jun; 27(6):75-8, 83-4. PubMed ID: 10282436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A right to exit? Kass LR Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(6):44; author reply 45. PubMed ID: 1428850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Between life and death lies dignity. Gasner R Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Prisoners of technology--the case of Nancy Cruzan. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1226-8. PubMed ID: 2325714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico. Schwartz RL N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Death by default. Lindgren J Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Perspectives. High court tackles right-to-die. Olson E Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Aug; 43(31):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Right-to-die ruling begs the question: who will decide? Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1990 Oct; 20(43):34-9. PubMed ID: 10113384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Still no court consensus on cutting life-support measures. Cohen GM Provider; 1989 Jul; 15(7):27-8. PubMed ID: 10293761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Care of the dying. New actions taken in Missouri, Georgia, and New Jersey. Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 10110279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Trilogy of cases on withdrawal of treatment. Rice F N J Nurse; 1988; 18(5):10, 12. PubMed ID: 3174414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1987 developments. National Legal Center Staff. Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):333-60. PubMed ID: 2967805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]