These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Mother v. fetus--the case of "do or die": in re A.C. Snyder DB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():319-37. PubMed ID: 10293012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mother's rights prevail: In re A.C. and the status of forced obstetrical intervention in the District of Columbia. Neale H J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):208-13. PubMed ID: 10105493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law]. Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections. Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Patients' Bill of Rights: women's rights under managed care and ERISA preemption. Theodos TF Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 10791118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inside the womb, outside the law. Murphy D Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):32. PubMed ID: 9687751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to say no. Ferguson P Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus? Cady RF JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1987 May; 316(19):1213-4. PubMed ID: 3574372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital affirms rights of pregnant patients in landmark case; new policy could be model for other hospitals. Hosp Patient Relat Rep; 1991 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10112075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to choose. Savage W Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]