These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Improving the peer review process: develop a professional review committee for better and quicker results. Agee C Healthc Exec; 2007; 22(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 17523355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach. Mills DH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constructing a new agenda. QRC Advis; 1991 Nov; 8(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 10115336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation. Himmelsbach CK; Sliwinski AJ; Lorber M; Mossman KL Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10316736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. Rosensaft J Man Med; 1978; 3(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10316738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic plan for medical staff analysis. Bramlett DL; Lamson RW Trustee; 1981 May; 34(5):44-5. PubMed ID: 10251205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standards for peer evaluation: the hospital quality assurance committee. Feldman SE; Roblin DW Am J Public Health; 1992 Apr; 82(4):525-7. PubMed ID: 1546768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of the peer review council. Pedersen A; Crabtree T; Ortiz-Tomei T Medsurg Nurs; 2004 Jun; 13(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15219165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Committee dynamics. Part II: Taking command of the medical staff committee process. Shampain P QRC Advis; 1989 Aug; 5(10):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 10324667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer group committee tackles physician behavior problems. Skillicorn SA Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Jul; 10(7):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Committee dynamics. Part I. Medical staff committees--you are entering the "twilight zone". Shampain P QRC Advis; 1989 May; 5(7):1-6. PubMed ID: 10292903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. First steps toward peer review. Jurf JB; Haley KW; Keegan PL; Williams PA; Ecoff L J Nurs Staff Dev; 1992; 8(4):184-6. PubMed ID: 1517867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary. George R Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review promotes professional growth. Patterson P OR Manager; 1992 Feb; 8(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10116555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]