These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Revalidation of physicians in Canada: are we passing the test? Levinson W CMAJ; 2008 Nov; 179(10):979-80. PubMed ID: 18981429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal issues in medical peer review. Fine DJ; Dunn JM W V Med J; 1984 Jul; 80(7):133-40. PubMed ID: 6589874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review. Tokarski C Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doctor policing: too tough? Too easy? Peer review: breaking the code of silence. Crane M Med Econ; 1999 May; 76(9):158-60, 162, 171. PubMed ID: 10537733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Data Bank inhibit peer review? Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1990 Dec; 71(10):58, 62. PubMed ID: 10108010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Violato C; Lockyer J Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 Aug; 11(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 16832707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review not a panacea. J Med Soc N J; 1971 Sep; 68(9):697. PubMed ID: 5285949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is peer review effective? Handler S Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The lowest common denominator. Headlee R Wis Med J; 1975 Apr; 74(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 1146351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review of the inexpert witness, or ... do you trust chickens to guard the coop? Victoroff MS Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):14-6. PubMed ID: 12369343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now? Brennan ED QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How do expert witnesses get away with lying? Crane M Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):152, 154, 163-4. PubMed ID: 10351077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion]. Stijntjes F; Veeken H Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulations in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Dillon GF; Boulet JR; Hawkins RE; Swanson DB Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i41-5. PubMed ID: 15465954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supporting doctors, or the beginning of the end for self-regulation? Jewell D Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jan; 50(450):4-5. PubMed ID: 10695058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sham peer review: perversions of a powerful process. Pfifferling JH; Meyer DN; Wang CJ Physician Exec; 2008; 34(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 19456073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Defaming a physician's career. The double edged sword of peer review privilege and immunity. Hwang NH J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 15204916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]