103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10297486)
1. Controlling eligibility errors in the Medicaid program.
Kugajevsky V; Lazar A
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 10297486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive review of Medicaid eligibility.
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):29-39. PubMed ID: 10297490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicaid quality control internal monitoring system.
Steffy MN; Ryan SE
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):40-52. PubMed ID: 10297491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicaid asset transfers draw governors' attention but extent of abuses remains unclear.
Schwartz R
Contemp Longterm Care; 1992 Oct; 15(10):26, 82. PubMed ID: 10121934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. California health chief to tackle 'Medi-Cal connection'.
Lewis R
Am Med News; 1978 Nov; 21(45):9. PubMed ID: 10297300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Care Financing Administration--Medicaid program; quality control system error rate: proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1979 Sep; 44(187):55316-8. PubMed ID: 10297592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Looking for errors in Medicaid: quality control techniques save dollars, improve management.
Stockton C
Forum (Wash); 1980 Dec; 4(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 7011926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New York Medicaid: never can say goodbye.
Fastiggi J
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2007; 16(3):581-615. PubMed ID: 18521998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital based eligibility worker.
Medford WD
Tex Hosp; 1978 Nov; 34(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10297295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Change not always good.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2004 Aug; 100(8):37-9. PubMed ID: 15386977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Innovative providers thrive under Medicaid managed care.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1999 Jul; 5(7):100-4. PubMed ID: 10539509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicaid program and State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) payment error rate measurement. Interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Oct; 70(192):58259-77. PubMed ID: 16206427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missouri's lock-in: control of recipient misutilization.
Singleton TE
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 10297488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Online enrollment in Medicaid and SCHIP.
Martin G
NCSL Legisbrief; 2005 Feb; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 15724319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State eligibility rules under separate state SCHIP programs--implications for children's access to health care.
Rosenbaum S; Markus A
Policy Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Sep; (4):1-22. PubMed ID: 12542078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicaid program; eligibility determinations based on disability--HCFA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1989 Dec; 54(236):50755-63. PubMed ID: 10304086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. West Virginia's Rx for drug costs: West Virginia's new prescription drug program is being called "the mouse that roared".
Kent C
State Legis; 2005 Feb; 32(2):23. PubMed ID: 15704275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of medicaid family planning waivers and Title X in enhancing access to preconception care.
Gold RB; Alrich C
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(6 Suppl):S47-51. PubMed ID: 19059549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicaid re-enrollment policies and children's risk of hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.
Bindman AB; Chattopadhyay A; Auerback GM
Med Care; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1049-54. PubMed ID: 18815526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Making the most of medicaid: promoting the health of women and infants with preconception care.
Salganicoff A; An J
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(6 Suppl):S41-6. PubMed ID: 18951816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
