These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Abortions and related medical services in federally assisted programs of the Public Health Service: final rule. Fed Regist; 1979 Feb; 44(24):6716-8. PubMed ID: 10297329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Questions and answers on HEW abortion regulations. Sellers B; Langston L Gov Relat Note; 1978 Feb; 4(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10297094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal financial participation in state claims for abortions. Fed Regist; 1978 Feb; 43(23):4571-82. PubMed ID: 10236701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978. Gold RB Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion). Sunstein CR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Office of Human Development Services--service programs for families and children, individuals and families, and aged, blind, or disabled persons; federal financial participation in state claims for abortions. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61599-600. PubMed ID: 10244085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critique of rules proposed by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Sterilization restrictions. Moss HC J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1978 Apr; 71(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 641360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion. Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Califano proposes ban on federal funding of some psychosurgery. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 May; 30(5):361, 365. PubMed ID: 447226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court and abortion: the irrelevance of medical judgment. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):23-4. PubMed ID: 7002867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. State restrictions on Medicaid coverage of medically necessary services. Finley LM Columbia Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 78(7):1491-1516. PubMed ID: 10297431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]