These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10298115)

  • 21. AHA attempts entry in Hill-Burton suit.
    Peterson RN
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Oct; 8(20):1-3. PubMed ID: 10273812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Federal government help on bad debts should include all hospitals.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 10297754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Obituary for Hill-Burton challenge: U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear Hill-Burton case.
    Peterson RN
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(10):1-3. PubMed ID: 10266519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reviewing the 1988 Hill-Burton amendments.
    Mowll CA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1988 May; 42(5):142, 144. PubMed ID: 10287411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health Resources Administration--Hill-Burton "uncompensated services" assurance; priorities for handling complaints. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1980 Oct; 45(192):65043-5. PubMed ID: 10248450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What major changes would proposed federal regulations make in the "uncompensated services" obligations of Hill-Burton hospitals?
    Jergesen AD
    Hosp Forum; 1978; 21(5):38, 32. PubMed ID: 10239750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Federal District Court denies Indiana hospitals Medicare reimbursement for return on equity and bad debt and charity care costs.
    Hofstra PS
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Aug; 5(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 10298612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ruling relaxes time limit on Hill-Burton credit.
    Greene J
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Aug; 18(32):3. PubMed ID: 10324538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. HHS publishes priorities for investigating Hill-Burton complaints.
    Hofstra P
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Oct; 3(21):10-1. PubMed ID: 10248345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hill-Burton facilities face catch-22 rules.
    Hickox RF
    Todays Nurs Home; 1980; 1(2):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 10324108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hill-Burton compliance remains a problem.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Aug; 6(10):5-7. PubMed ID: 10303922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. HEW answers Hill-Burton questions.
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Mar; 34(3):22. PubMed ID: 10246296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medicare reimbursement for Hill-Burton uncompensated care still controversial.
    Hofstra PS
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 10298614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PRRB decisions: Hill-Burton uncompensated services are not allowable costs.
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Feb; 34(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 10297768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. HHS enforcement action held contrary to Hill-Burton regulations.
    Teske JM
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Aug; 11(18):1-3. PubMed ID: 10288593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health care for the poor. A public-policy imperative.
    Whitcomb ME
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Nov; 315(19):1220-2. PubMed ID: 3093865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Making your hospital's Hill-Burton allocation plan work.
    Hofstra PS
    Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(10):93-6. PubMed ID: 7216199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hill-Burton enforcement: slow but relentless.
    Greenberg PC; Blood JF
    Healthspan; 1990 May; 7(5):3-9. PubMed ID: 10106740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HHS revises Hill-Burton interpretation in response to Douglas County decision.
    Singer LE; Pryga EA
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Dec; 11(25):2-5. PubMed ID: 10290723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas v. Harris: a dubious consequence of piecemeal health care legislation.
    Berk DK
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(2):205-24. PubMed ID: 6367441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.