These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10298394)

  • 1. Some criteria for evaluating medical research literature.
    Breaux SR; Karz BM
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Feb; 53(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 10298394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of medical practices].
    Battista RN
    Union Med Can; 1980 Oct; 109(10):1462-7. PubMed ID: 6781111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading between the lines of clinical trials--II: Analysis.
    Drug Ther Bull; 1985 Jan; 23(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 3967581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perusing the literature.
    Hawkins BS
    Control Clin Trials; 1982 Dec; 3(4):371-83. PubMed ID: 6761064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating medical research.
    Seay TA
    Prim Care; 1980 Dec; 7(4):723-46. PubMed ID: 6908089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic studies in perinatal medicine.
    Tyson JE; Reisch JS; Mize SG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Aug; 64(2):300-2. PubMed ID: 6738965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating research: what it means to you.
    Maklebust J; Margolis DJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and conduct of clinical trials in systemic sepsis. Critical analysis of VA Cooperative Study No. 209.
    Shatney CH
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1988; 264():71-80. PubMed ID: 3289037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical biostatistics. XLV. The purposes and functions of criteria.
    Feinstein AR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1978 Oct; 24(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 688738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring clinical trials.
    Sharples K; Fleming TR; MacMahon S; Moore A; Reid I; Scoggins B
    N Z Med J; 1998 Aug; 111(1072):322-5. PubMed ID: 9765633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting age-related aspects of antihypertensive treatment: statistical defects and their remedy.
    Murray GD; Lesaffre E; Robertson JI
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1988 Nov; 6(1):S121-6. PubMed ID: 3063787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Tamiflu trials.
    Loder E; Tovey D; Godlee F
    BMJ; 2014 Apr; 348():g2630. PubMed ID: 24811414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The issue of side effects and the "blind ability" of clinical drug trials.
    Katz R; Deveaugh-Geiss J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Nov; 150(11):1759-60; author reply 1760-1. PubMed ID: 8214202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The issue of side effects and the "blind ability" of clinical drug trials.
    Duberstein PR
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Nov; 150(11):1760; author reply 1760-1. PubMed ID: 8214203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of health-related quality of life measurements in the design of drug clinical trials.
    San Miguel R; del Villar V; PĂ©rez C; de Frutos M; Mar J; Coma MJ
    Farm Hosp; 2010; 34(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20144817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the evidence.
    Holmes MA
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):447-62. PubMed ID: 17466749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiologic methods and methodologic vigilance.
    Horwitz RI; Ransohoff DF
    J Gen Intern Med; 1988; 3(3):298-9. PubMed ID: 3379496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients as their own controls in studies of therapeutic efficacy: can we trust the results of non-randomized trials?
    Weiss NS; Heckbert SR
    J Gen Intern Med; 1988; 3(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 3404300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction: evaluating clinical trial data from schizophrenia research.
    Tamminga CA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2001; 62 Suppl 9():3-4. PubMed ID: 11379829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS
    N Engl J Med; 1984 May; 310(21):1404-8. PubMed ID: 6717522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.