These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10298394)

  • 21. Evaluating the medical literature, Part III: Results and discussion.
    Elenbaas JK; Cuddy PG; Elenbaas RM
    Ann Emerg Med; 1983 Nov; 12(11):679-86. PubMed ID: 6356998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidelines and consensus statements regarding the conduction and reporting of clinical research studies.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 May; 167(9):877-8. PubMed ID: 17502527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Randomised clinical trials.
    Br Med J; 1977 May; 1(6071):1238-9. PubMed ID: 324569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical trials.
    Smith AJ
    Med J Aust; 1984 Jun; 140(12):720-3. PubMed ID: 6727737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring the use of the sham design for interventional trials: implications for endoscopic research.
    Wilcox CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jan; 67(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 18155434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Designs for studies evaluating tests.
    Dewey ME
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1997 Apr; 12(4):492-4. PubMed ID: 9178057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trials evaluating antibiotics in rheumatoid arthritis: an overview.
    Chêne G; Lequen L; Schaeverbeke T
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1999 Jan; 66(1 Suppl):67S-72S. PubMed ID: 10063530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic approach for evaluating and scoring human data.
    Money CD; Tomenson JA; Penman MG; Boogaard PJ; Jeffrey Lewis R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jul; 66(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 23579077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical trials: a journey of discovery.
    Cross RD; Nears A
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Jun 14-20; 14(39):44-7. PubMed ID: 11974331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Commentary: RECORD response.
    Coutts G
    BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5409. PubMed ID: 20940216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical trials; the admissibility of generalization of outcome].
    Lankhorst GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Nov; 131(47):2118-20. PubMed ID: 3683648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Method for assessment of the reporting standard of clinical trials with roentgen contrast media.
    Andrew E
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 6731012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Double-blinding in clinical trials.
    Ney PG
    CMAJ; 1989 Jan; 140(1):15. PubMed ID: 2909265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.
    Joshi M; Royuela A; Zamora J
    BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):915-9. PubMed ID: 23759083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Data availability for industry sponsored trials: what should medical journals require?
    Steinbrook R; Kassirer JP
    BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5391. PubMed ID: 20940213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies.
    Reisch JS; Tyson JE; Mize SG
    Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):815-27. PubMed ID: 2797977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ethical issues in the design of osteoporosis clinical trials: the state of the question.
    Heaney RP
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1117-20. PubMed ID: 12817766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting quality--the weakest link?
    Thornton H
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):374-5. PubMed ID: 18063432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Industry funded clinical trials: bias and quality.
    Del Parigi A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jan; 28(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 22103762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of antianxiety drugs. HEW (FDA) 77-3043, September 1977.
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1979 Dec; 1(5):297-312. PubMed ID: 45205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.