These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10298675)
1. Competition: California takes the lead. Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Sep; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10298675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital head gets brunt of referral battle. Perry L Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug; 19(32):38. PubMed ID: 10294196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Price competition will be legacy of California's Medi-Cal 'czar'. Johnson DE Mod Healthc; 1982 Sep; 12(9):52-4. PubMed ID: 10298664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective contracting in California: experience in the second year. Johns L; Anderson MD; Derzon RA Inquiry; 1985; 22(4):335-47. PubMed ID: 2934329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New face at the bargaining table. McCann RW; Tomaselli LA Hospitals; 1983 Oct; 57(20):75-9. PubMed ID: 6352455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When 'preferred' becomes 'exclusive'. Gibbons DL; Ismach JM Med World News; 1983 Feb; 24(4):65-6. PubMed ID: 10299163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medi-Cal-fostered competition seen as control on costs, incentive to increase hospital efficiency. Lipschultz C Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 10298923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. California selective provider contracting program: two-tier medicine here we come, right back where we started from. Liset JR Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 4-6. PubMed ID: 10298924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medi-Cal contracting: model or mayhem? Friedman E Hospitals; 1984 Aug; 58(15):74-8. PubMed ID: 6376328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitals should enter exclusive contracts for the right reasons. Holthaus D Trustee; 1989 May; 42(5):17. PubMed ID: 10293083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Losing the battle but winning the war: the North Dakota Hospital Assn. decision. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Sep; 9(18):5-7. PubMed ID: 10300949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Restraint of trade through hospital exclusive contracts: an economic appraisal of the legal theory. Lynk WJ J Health Polit Policy Law; 1984; 9(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 6491230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealers win on two counts vs. AHSC. Bale CJ Med Prod Sales; 1982 May; 13(5):1, 17-8, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10255350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Alberta laundry competes with commercial for the right to continue its in-house plant. Ballinger J Laund News; 1985 Dec; 11(12):3. PubMed ID: 10274634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde: return to reality in economic power analysis in tying cases. Bern RC Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Aug; 8(6):7-35. PubMed ID: 10277805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Marketing middlemen can be held liable if they regularly sell hospital supplies. Decker R Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Sep; 14(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 10294709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Progress report on hospital cost control in California. More regulation than competition. Petersdorf RG N Engl J Med; 1983 Jul; 309(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 6346095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective contracting in California: early effects and policy implications. Johns L; Derzon RA; Anderson MD Inquiry; 1985; 22(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 2933330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]