26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10298700)
1. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and reproductive medicine: guidelines for compliance.
Cackowski A
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10160175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'?
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
George R
Man Med; 1978; 3(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10316737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards and bioethics committees: their role in ensuring ethical home care research.
Cary AH
Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):113-8. PubMed ID: 10285378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities.
Knepper JD
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Oct; 53(5):97-101. PubMed ID: 10298700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Time for new rules on human subjects research?
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(6):23-4. PubMed ID: 9868606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethical analysis of risk.
Weijer C
J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):344-61. PubMed ID: 11317427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials.
King NM
J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):332-43. PubMed ID: 11317426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dealing with conflicts of interest in biomedical research: IRB oversight as the next best solution to the abolitionist approach.
Goldner JA
J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):379-404. PubMed ID: 11317429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The ethics of clinical trials: a child's view.
Rosato J
J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):362-78. PubMed ID: 11317428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
