171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10299209)
21. California charts a new competitive course. Interview by Walter J. Unger.
Guy WA
Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Dec; 36(12):60-1, 64-74. PubMed ID: 10315250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct patient settlements best for all parties.
McNulty EG
Hospitals; 1980 May; 54(9):129-31. PubMed ID: 7364402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Competition: California takes the lead.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Sep; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10298675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The St. Joseph's experience. Reducing backlogs with contract billers.
Camarena RW
Hosp Financ Manage; 1982 Jan; 36(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 10253854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medi-Cal contracting: model or mayhem?
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1984 Aug; 58(15):74-8. PubMed ID: 6376328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Selective contracting: California's hot potato?
Berger JD
Hosp Forum; 1982; 25(6):7-14. PubMed ID: 10298694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Consider impact before terminating Medi-Cal contract.
Bookman LA
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):36, 47. PubMed ID: 10113780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. California selective provider contracting program: two-tier medicine here we come, right back where we started from.
Liset JR
Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 4-6. PubMed ID: 10298924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. When 'preferred' becomes 'exclusive'.
Gibbons DL; Ismach JM
Med World News; 1983 Feb; 24(4):65-6. PubMed ID: 10299163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. How to negotiate a Medi-Cal inpatient contract.
DeMuro PR
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 10113778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Access loss forces Medicaid strategy evaluation.
Larkin H
Hospitals; 1989 Oct; 63(20):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 2676829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Contract management requires strategic planning.
Schneller ES; Williams FG
Healthc Financ Manage; 1989 Mar; 43(3):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 10303223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Illinois follows California's example with contracts; other states mull plan.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1985 Apr; 15(9):40. PubMed ID: 10300143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medi-Cal-fostered competition seen as control on costs, incentive to increase hospital efficiency.
Lipschultz C
Health Law Vigil; 1983 May; 6(10):suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 10298923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. New California strategy for medical assistance favors public health and organized plans.
Cole CA
Urban Health; 1982 Aug; 11(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 10298748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Medi-Cal hospital contracting--did it achieve its legislative objectives?
Brown ER; Price WT; Cousineau MR
West J Med; 1985 Jul; 143(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 3898595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Growing alternatives for computerized pharmacy.
Snodgrass G; Weiner T
Comput Healthc; 1983 Apr; 4(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 10278157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Alabama prisons using contract services to fulfill court order.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(2):57. PubMed ID: 10250026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. How to prepare data for Medi-Cal negotiation.
Foley JC
Calif Hosp; 1991; 5(5):32-4. PubMed ID: 10113779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Republic plans to restructure $200 million loan used for buyout in attempt to return to profitability.
Lutz S
Mod Healthc; 1987 May; 17(11):68. PubMed ID: 10282380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
