211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10299327)
1. TEFRA: a primer for the uninitiated.
Kenety WH
Pathologist; 1983 Sep; 37(9):655-8. PubMed ID: 10299327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathology practice under TEFRA and DRGs.
Breckenridge RL
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):560-2. PubMed ID: 10310298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAP v. Heckler and HCFA's modification of TEFRA regulations.
Bierig JR; Dechene JC
Pathologist; 1984 Oct; 38(10):661-3. PubMed ID: 10273583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Teaming up with administrators to set prospective payment policy.
Shaw LD
Pathologist; 1984 Jun; 38(6):352-3. PubMed ID: 10273529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calling it like it is: reimbursement narcosis.
Schoen I
Pathologist; 1984 Nov; 38(11):747-8. PubMed ID: 10273593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Despite ongoing challenges, pathologist reimbursement rules take effect.
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Mar; 16(3):27, 29. PubMed ID: 10273470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surviving prospective reimbursement: how computers can help contain lab costs.
Aller RD
Pathologist; 1985 Apr; 39(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 10317589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What the regulatory developments mean for pathologist-hospital contracts.
Bierig JR; Dechene JC
Pathologist; 1984 Sep; 38(9):562-7. PubMed ID: 10273568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Join hospitals in working toward a common reimbursement goal.
Scibetta LP
Pathologist; 1983 Aug; 37(8):552-5. PubMed ID: 10273423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negotiating your contract: points to consider.
Zeiler WB
Pathologist; 1984 Sep; 38(9):568-71. PubMed ID: 10273569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comments of the American College of Pathologists on proposed regulations on payment for physician services in institutional practice.
Pathologist; 1982 Dec; 36(12):suppl ii-xii. PubMed ID: 10261169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathologists to challenge Medicare rule.
Lewis R
Am Med News; 1983 Apr; 26(14):1, 19. PubMed ID: 10324806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathologists hope HHS clarification will give them leverage with hospitals.
Wallace C
Mod Healthc; 1984 Jun; 14(8):28, 30. PubMed ID: 10273518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Directing the post-TEFRA laboratory.
Sharp JW
Pathologist; 1985 Feb; 39(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 10270443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to manage under prospective payment.
Sisk FA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 Apr; 19(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 10312034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of case-based payment for inpatient radiology, anesthesia, and pathology services.
Mitchell JB; Rosenbach ML
Inquiry; 1989; 26(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 2533172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospitals for radical new cost rules.
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Jan; 15(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10298828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The coming of Medicare--a turbulent time for pathology: Part II.
Coleman FC
Pathologist; 1981 May; 35(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10298172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fulfilling Medicare's criteria for consultative services.
Pastuszak WT
Pathologist; 1985 Jun; 39(6):31-4. PubMed ID: 10300151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What the new Medicare rules mean to pathologists.
Cole GW
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 May; 15(5):50-4. PubMed ID: 10299168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
