These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10299720)

  • 1. PRO-hospital contracts: the last chance to ease burden of reviews.
    O'Hare PK; Collier G
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):54-8. PubMed ID: 10299720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PRO review of hospital admissions of Medicare patients.
    Akhter MN
    Mo Med; 1985 Mar; 82(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 3919255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PSRO: an evaluation of the Professional Standards Review Organization.
    J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 10308911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Government, PROs racing to implement tough review system.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):44-50. PubMed ID: 10299719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perspectives. PROs: Medicare's paper tigers?
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Nov; 42(44):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10302877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization review in the United States: results from a 1976-1977 national survey of hospitals.
    Gertman PM; Monheit AC; Anderson JJ; Eagle JB; Levenson DK
    Med Care; 1979 Aug; 17(8 Suppl):i-iii, 1-148. PubMed ID: 381795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evaluation of Professional Standards Review Organizations: their part in the struggle to assure appropriate health care.
    Davis FA
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 6810978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review organizations and skilled nursing facilities.
    Teplitzky SV; Demaree LA
    Healthspan; 1989 Feb; 6(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 10303237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Medicare review system an option for private sector.
    Garrigan LA
    Bus Insur; 1986 Feb; 20(7):45-6. PubMed ID: 10324862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Going after favorable PRO determinations.
    Gosfield AG
    Cost Containment; 1985 Oct; 7(19):3-6. PubMed ID: 10273714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New PRO contracts fuel debate.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1986 Apr; 27(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10276403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of Medicare hospital utilization trends for long term home health care.
    Kelly JT; Shea MA; Ross JE
    Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1987; 6(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10301751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRO objectives and quality criteria.
    Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA
    Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review.
    Luecke RW
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new economics of PSRO review: an uncertain future.
    Luecke RW; Freeman JK
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Apr; 35(4):56-8, 60, 62. PubMed ID: 10273247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department.
    McGarvey MR
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.