These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10301021)

  • 1. Costs or quality: what do the watchdogs watch?
    Heinz J
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10301021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Assurance Act could 'watch' HHAs.
    Home Health J; 1986 Mar; 7(3):4, 8. PubMed ID: 10300707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Gotcha' gives way to guidance. Quality improvement behind plan to change Medicare review groups' image.
    Lovern E
    Mod Healthc; 2001 Dec; 31(51):20. PubMed ID: 11808048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information and Quality Healthcare update.
    McIlwain JS
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1999 Apr; 40(4):139-40. PubMed ID: 10389382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overhauling Medicare's quality assurance program.
    Frank KM
    Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(2):68, 82. PubMed ID: 2184373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The vital signs of quality improvement organizations.
    Pentecost MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Dec; 2(12):975-8. PubMed ID: 17411979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs.
    Cunningham R
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: indictment, trial and beyond.
    Hudson JD; Ravreby MD
    Iowa Med; 1989 Dec; 79(12):580-2. PubMed ID: 2689389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. You and the PRO.
    Rheney JW
    J S C Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 86(7):406-10. PubMed ID: 2398739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working with the PRO. Foundation for Health Care Evaluation.
    Minn Med; 1989 May; 72(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 2659957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO.
    Ponder S
    Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process.
    Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pro third scope of work: two major changes.
    Ponder S
    Colo Med; 1989 Nov; 86(17):344-5. PubMed ID: 2680235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking the PROs down a new road to quality. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
    Jencks SF
    Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):20-3. PubMed ID: 10121373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A second opinion on PROS.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Weiser RR
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare launches pilot of new beneficiary complaint alternatives--testing to take place in six states.
    J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Dec; 95(7):270-1. PubMed ID: 9871388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PRO update. Transition from the third to fourth scope of work.
    Baker NA
    Mich Med; 1992 Apr; 91(4):42, 45-7. PubMed ID: 1614338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance. PROs struggle to keep role in private Medicare plans.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(25):52. PubMed ID: 10167951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.