248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10301545)
1. Utilization review, DRGs, and physician autonomy.
Schuch RJ; Levy JA
J Med Pract Manage; 1986; 2(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10301545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of the physician in the home health prospective payment system.
Mo Med; 2000 Oct; 97(10):477-9. PubMed ID: 11043029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost containment, DRGs, and the ethics of health care. A physician's reflections.
Berenson RA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2714961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
Politser P
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2003 and inclusion of registered nurses in the personnel provision of the critical access hospital emergency services requirement for frontier areas and remote locations. Final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2002 Dec; 67(251):79965-80184. PubMed ID: 12510665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital utilization control by PROs: a guide through the maze.
Gosfield AG
Healthspan; 1985 Feb; 2(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 10311126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilization and quality review under the prospective rate system.
Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Feb; 10(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 6424075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Payment mechanisms, nonprice incentives, and organizational innovation in health care.
Robinson JC
Inquiry; 1993; 30(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 8406788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationing of medical care and the preservation of clinical judgment.
Mechanic D
J Fam Pract; 1980 Sep; 11(3):431-3. PubMed ID: 7411069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work.
Gosfield AG
Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers?
Kotelchuck R
Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization review within PPS.
Meyers VW; Hober F
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1984 May; 2(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 10273503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
Atkinson G; Murray R
J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of the PRO physician adviser.
Crockett W
Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):842-3. PubMed ID: 2124590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies and five-year review of and adjustments to the relative value units under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2002. Final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2001 Nov; 66(212):55245-503. PubMed ID: 11760761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Payment Error Prevention Program (PEPP): reducing Medicare payment errors in prospective payment system hospitals.
Bitonte DA; Curry P; Butler P; Nowak MJ; Jean-Baptiste R; Feigenbaum RA
Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 May; 21(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 11378983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PRO sanctions: a practical guide to the process.
Darling WD; Gleitz HG
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10302181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.
Manchikanti L; Giordano J
Pain Physician; 2007 Sep; 10(5):607-26. PubMed ID: 17876359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing an in-house physician advisor program.
Lawless GD; Holt DB
Physician Exec; 1991; 17(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 10111670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2005. Final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2004 Nov; 69(219):66235-915. PubMed ID: 15551493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
