These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10302314)

  • 1. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission.
    Weeks HS
    W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations; imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(76):15233-40. PubMed ID: 10299475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations--imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15335-47. PubMed ID: 10299990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare PROs and the assessment of quality: should physician-specific quality data be released to consumers?
    Baker N
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Apr; 25(4):97-109, 117. PubMed ID: 10123435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia.
    Brehm JG; Smith SM
    W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roundtable demonstration ... review of care given in private physician offices to Medicare beneficiaries.
    Palmer RH
    Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS41-4; discussion JS44-7. PubMed ID: 7823658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Change should aid peer review groups in disciplining physicians.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Nov; 20(47):24. PubMed ID: 10107694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PROs make us waste time and money.
    Gambrell TR
    Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health care programs: fraud and abuse; revisions to the PRO sanctions process--HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1995 Dec; 60(238):63634-45. PubMed ID: 10153804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Fourth PRO Scope of Work: automating the medical review process through the Uniform Clinical Data Set.
    Baker NA
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):11-9. PubMed ID: 10119374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PROs to deny payment for substandard quality care.
    Banach J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 10303483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.
    Dans PE; Weiner JP; Otter SE
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(18):1131-7. PubMed ID: 3930964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PROs aren't catching bad providers, audit says.
    Weissenstein E
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Feb; 26(8):23. PubMed ID: 10154755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicare bills to restore confidence; expand PROs.
    Borfitz D
    Home Health J; 1986 Aug; 7(8):2, 11, 13. PubMed ID: 10301011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The private initiative in PSRO.
    Sanazaro PJ
    Hospitals; 1979 Jan; 53(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 363596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.