These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. New federal regulations, professional standards review organization, JCAH and criteria development. Tucker JH; Rogers J Med Rec News; 1975 Feb; 46(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10318407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A second opinion on PROS. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court rules PROs must inform Medicare beneficiaries of health care review results. McGinty C; Herron S GHA Today; 2003 Jul; 47(7):3. PubMed ID: 12953377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. PRO changes under the fourth scope of work for Medicare. Kingsley DI N J Med; 1991 Jul; 88(7):499-500. PubMed ID: 1891129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Professional Standards Review Organization: imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1978 Oct; 43(199):47473-7. PubMed ID: 10297254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of the PROs. Scala M Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2001; 2(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work. Gosfield AG Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Managed-care groups infuriated by PRO's data showing more quality woes at HMOs. Tokarski C Mod Healthc; 1990 Aug; 20(33):30. PubMed ID: 10106874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Extra: HCFA list of 18 ways to incur PRO penalty points. Part B News; 1989 Aug; 3(8):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10303749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Relation between quality assessment and utilization review in a functioning PSRO. Nelson AR N Engl J Med; 1975 Mar; 292(13):671-5. PubMed ID: 1089879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The quality assurance program at Memorial Hospital. Professional standards review organizations (PSRO) and quality care for the cancer patient. Dunphey GJ; Scheiner E; Catlin D Clin Bull; 1974; 4(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 4857253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare sanctions--do providers have a right to a pre-termination hearing? Aronson P; Cuden CT Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1986; 19(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10301235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Can PROs uncover quality concerns? Magoffin CJ Bus Health; 1986; 3(8):14-6. PubMed ID: 10300896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]