These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10302314)
41. Progress in the review of medical care. Kent D Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 346465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Utilization and quality control Peer Review Program; solicitation of comments on proposed scope of work for waivered and exempt PRO areas--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1984 Mar; 49(53):9959-60. PubMed ID: 10273455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review program; third Scope of Work for peer review organizations--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1988 Sep; 53(176):35234-7. PubMed ID: 10302729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Editorial: On measuring "quality" health care: beyond the hospital. Egdahl RH; Taft CH N Engl J Med; 1976 Jan; 294(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 942670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO. Ponder S Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Utilization review, DRGs, and physician autonomy. Schuch RJ; Levy JA J Med Pract Manage; 1986; 2(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10301545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How close is North Carolina to meeting Medicare's clinical priorities? Kelley M; McArdle J; Weiser R; Simpson R N C Med J; 2001; 62(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 11468985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Development of hospital levels of care criteria. Holloway DC; Holton JP; Goldberg GA; Restuccia JD Health Care Manage Rev; 1976; 1(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 10297443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. PSROs--implications for hospitals. McMahon JA Hospitals; 1974 Jan; 48(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 4855639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Denial of payment for poor quality care. Missouri's PRO explains Medicare's latest requirement. Akhter MN; Jaco D Mo Med; 1987 Mar; 84(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 3334407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Utilization review for Medicare. Is this a good use of nurses' time? Snider ME Am J Nurs; 1977 Jan; 77(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 319665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. QAP: the AHA's program. Brown MB; Sale WB Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):59-62 passim. PubMed ID: 4856107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program. Roper WL Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Use a streamlined approach for medical record abstraction. Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Jun; 10(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10180626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The impact of PROs on orthopaedic practice. Nichols JC Orthop Rev; 1990 Jan; 19(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 2390140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]