235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10302326)
21. OBRA's open-book test is no breeze.
Hey M
Health Prog; 1991; 72(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 10108419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. When the surveyor calls.
Wagner L
Provider; 1995 Jun; 21(6):58-62. PubMed ID: 10143279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Congress's watchful eye. Interview by Yvonne Parsons.
Grassley C
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Nov; 22(11):78. PubMed ID: 10662116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Survey and enforcement proposal requires facility attention.
Cook MH; Turner SA
Provider; 1993 Apr; 19(4):48-9. PubMed ID: 10125030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Informal dispute resolution: should you or shouldn't you?
Schessler CE
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Nov; 21(11):73-4. PubMed ID: 10346151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Drug distribution and the PaCS survey.
Shor JB
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Jul; 9(7):45-6. PubMed ID: 10280728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medicare and Medicaid termination procedures.
Hamme JM; Kanner SR
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Oct; 9(10):24-7. PubMed ID: 10301341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Some reassurance on quality assurance privilege.
Infante MC
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Aug; 20(8):71. PubMed ID: 10170024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Survey to stress quality assurance.
Wagner L
Provider; 1995 Jul; 21(7):37-8. PubMed ID: 10143788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medicare and Medicaid: long-term care survey--HCFA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1988 Jun; 53(117):22850-3101. PubMed ID: 10302506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Getting ready for MDS--again.
Infante M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Mar; 18(3):67. PubMed ID: 10141059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dealing with due process concerns.
Miles F
Provider; 1995 Mar; 21(3):71-2. PubMed ID: 10140703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. How to prepare for the new HCFA survey procedures.
Kelly R; Skelton N
Provider; 1989 Oct; 15(10):48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10295724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. HCFA proposes modifications to verification of compliance policy.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Mar; 9(6):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 11302012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Understanding administrative appeals.
Bianculli JL
Provider; 1999 Feb; 25(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10345492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. GAO: HCFA failed to sanction Calif. nursing homes.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(31):8. PubMed ID: 10183057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Survey & certification Q & A on the Medicare Hospice Benefit from the CMS Hospice Expert Panel.
Neigh J
Caring; 2005 Oct; 24(10):82-3. PubMed ID: 16358538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey process gets a total makeover.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Feb; 18(2):21. PubMed ID: 10140129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Standards of care and sanctions for breaches: the survey process in long-term care.
Chester CF
J Long Term Care Adm; 1989; 17(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 10304017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The interpretive guidelines: rote, reason or regulation?
Infante M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1991 Jul; 14(7):54, 78. PubMed ID: 10112233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
