308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10302485)
1. Usage of PERT (project evaluation review techniques) networks in medical record practice.
Lovin FW
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10302485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Database applications in medical record management.
Waters K; Murphy G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1987 Jun; 7(4):18-29. PubMed ID: 10302445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Planning and organizing the medical health record department.
McCaffrey K
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Mar; 3(3):29-40. PubMed ID: 10298870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Renovation of a medical record department: a case study.
Chorba C
Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 10300498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Forecasting and the medical record department.
Caswell RJ
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 10302196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Redesigning a medical record department: a case study.
Osborn CE; Bartha L
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 10302724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interim targeting: a productivity improvement method that works.
Kahl K; Peterson C; Dickson G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10104362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The automated medical record: a practical realization?
Benjamin CD; Baum BH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10288791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Case study: concurrent medical record review in a university hospital setting.
Faust BL; Speck CC
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10303870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What is a LAN ... and is it for me?
Kuyper L
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1987 Oct; 58(10):45-7, 66. PubMed ID: 10301916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for evaluating medical record software.
Gordon KR
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Nov; 59(11):24-9. PubMed ID: 10290073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring productivity in medical record departments.
Barnes TW
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):19-31. PubMed ID: 10263567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities.
Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Prado D
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):24-33. PubMed ID: 10287421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Product-line management defined.
Campbell V
Top Health Rec Manage; 1990 Jun; 10(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 10106654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moving a medical record department: a case study.
Bertrand MM
Top Health Rec Manage; 1985 Dec; 6(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 10300499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Record ring: moving toward solutions--a quality control circle in a medical record department.
Karpel J; Spencer R; Schamberger T; Klein W
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Jan; 54(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10309816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing a multihospital medical record department.
Patena KR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):37-47. PubMed ID: 10286132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some observations on medical records practice and training in the U.S.A.
Lund B
Med Rec Health Care Inf J; 1980 Feb; 21(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10245961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical record software evaluation and selection.
Sourapas KJ; Friedman D
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Jun; 8(4):48-53. PubMed ID: 10302469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automation of medical records can boost cash flow.
Demorsky S
Healthc Financ Manage; 1990 Oct; 44(10):20-4, 26, 28. PubMed ID: 10145321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
