125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10302557)
1. The rights of the living and the rights of the dying.
Kirby MD
Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():192-205. PubMed ID: 10302557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The liberal neutrality of living and dying: bioethics, constitutional law, and political theory in the American right-to-die debate.
Jennings B
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 16(1):97-126. PubMed ID: 10695247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies?
Murray TH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 10121877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Do we own our bodies?
Calabresi G
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 10121879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. I have a conscience, too: the plight of medical personnel confronting the right to die.
Loftus IP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1990; 65(4):699-730. PubMed ID: 16044606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking the prohibition of death row prisoners as organ donors: a possible lifeline to those on organ donor waiting lists.
Perales DJ
St Marys Law J; 2003; 34(3):687-732. PubMed ID: 15233131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg?
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide?
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006) and constitutional civil rights in the United States.
Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1830; author reply 1830. PubMed ID: 19373069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Last resorts and fundamental rights: the substantive due process implications of prohibitions on medical marijuana.
Harv Law Rev; 2005 Apr; 118(6):1985-2006. PubMed ID: 15838991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics and the civil rights movement. Why informed consent is too little, too late.
Sellers J
Second Opin; 1989 Nov; (12):46-61. PubMed ID: 10304148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The constitutionality of statutes prohibiting and permitting physician-assisted suicide.
Rosenn JR
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1997 Apr; 51(3):875-905. PubMed ID: 12953670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethicist questions the law, morality and ethics of medical research.
Radford T
CMAJ; 1986 Feb; 134(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 3942934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intention, action, and the dead donor rule: commentary on Spike.
DuBois JM
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):78-84; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 10904895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. First report of the Social Development Committee on options for dying with dignity.
Aust Health Rev; 1986; 9(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 10279579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Organ donation, patients' rights, and medical responsibilities at the end of life.
Iltis AS; Rie MA; Wall A
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):310-5. PubMed ID: 19050624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
