These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303031)
1. RVS (relative value scale) would have modest impact on fees. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Nov; 18(48):4. PubMed ID: 10303031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use and misuse of relative value scales under Medicare. Scott JS Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 10303855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The RB-RVS challenge. An opportunity for equality. Ogrod ES Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 10303708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hsiao's relative value scale shifts MD incomes, but not utilization. Robinson ML Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):22, 26. PubMed ID: 3053393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical practice trends: a new system for paying Medicare fees to doctors--how much, how soon? Golin CB J Med Pract Manage; 1989; 4(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 10303245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. RVS (relative value scale) results could spark reform, conflict. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Sep; 18(40):2. PubMed ID: 10324903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impact. The Medicare fee schedule. Dempsey WS Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Resource-based RVS (relative value scale) could change physician payments. Konka K Med Group Manage J; 1988; 35(6):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 10303022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Harvard's RVS (relative value scale) study gets mixed reviews. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(41):24. PubMed ID: 10290438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Specialty differentials: are they needed in a physician payment system? Reardon TR Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10303294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The tinkering with RBRVS begins. Kirchner M Med Econ; 1989 Aug; 66(15):104-8, 110, 113-6 passim. PubMed ID: 10303734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. PhysPRC (Physician Payment Review Commission) report--the shape of things to come. Doherty RB Internist; 1988; 29(5):23-5, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10302524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The equalizer. Sorian R New Physician; 1988; 37(5):17-21. PubMed ID: 10302582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Will this formula change the way you get paid? Kirchner M Med Econ; 1988 Apr; 65(7):138-42, 145, 149 passim. PubMed ID: 10302306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AAFP (American Academy of Family Physicians): specialty differentials should be dropped. Graham R; Sweeney R Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10303291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using physician time and complexity to identify mispriced procedures. Cromwell J; Mitchell JB; Rosenbach ML; Stason WB; Hurdle S Inquiry; 1989; 26(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 2523347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ASIM (American Society of Internal Medicine): balancing the need for specialty differentials. Olson DR Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new RBRVS in full perspective. McNerney WJ Internist; 1989 Apr; 30(4):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dollar impact of RVS: AMA study. Koska MT Hospitals; 1989 Jan; 63(1):61. PubMed ID: 2642462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]