383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303265)
21. Dealing with due process concerns.
Miles F
Provider; 1995 Mar; 21(3):71-2. PubMed ID: 10140703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Bracing for enforcement.
Myder JA
Provider; 1994 Apr; 20(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 10133532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Surviving the survey. New process turns up the heat on administrators.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Nov; 18(11):69-70. PubMed ID: 10153600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New inspection proposal shows IOM (Institute of Medicine) influence.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1988 Jan; 11(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10302045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA to allow imposition of CMPs (civil monetary penalties) up to $10,000 for single violations.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Apr; 7(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10351614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New enforcement rules clarify OBRA.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Jan; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 10139442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Scrutiny will slack off even though rules deregulating industry scrapped.
Robinson ML
Mod Healthc; 1982 May; 12(5):34. PubMed ID: 10255335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Public policy development for nursing homes.
Holder E
Contemp Longterm Care; 1987 Aug; 10(8):74. PubMed ID: 10283295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effecting nursing home reform through the courts.
Weiss H
Contemp Longterm Care; 1987 Oct; 10(10):18, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10284104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. OBRA's open-book test is no breeze.
Hey M
Health Prog; 1991; 72(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 10108419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Moving ahead with the challenge: meeting the OBRA mandate.
Friedlob A; Steinfort L; Santoro V; Luten E
Provider; 1990 Apr; 16(4):14-5, 17-9. PubMed ID: 10104169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How to use the survey process as a facility management tool.
Harkins MJ
Provider; 1988 Apr; 14(4):30, 32, 34. PubMed ID: 10302326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Standards of care and sanctions for breaches: the survey process in long-term care.
Chester CF
J Long Term Care Adm; 1989; 17(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 10304017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. ACHA comments on IOM's report.
Capistrant G
Provider; 1986 Jul; 12(7):36-41. PubMed ID: 10300893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Moving ahead with the challenge: making sense of OBRA.
Hoyer T; Rau R; Frank B; Froisness R
Provider; 1990 Mar; 16(3):14-20. PubMed ID: 10106469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. GAO wants increases in CMS oversight of nursing homes.
Turnbull GB
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):20-1. PubMed ID: 14703638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Sometimes it pays to appeal survey findings.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Feb; 21(2):69. PubMed ID: 10177553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey presents opportunity for building legal defense.
Lynn NJ; Neiman RK
Provider; 1991 Jul; 17(7):30-1. PubMed ID: 10114255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Proper plan of correction responses.
Hurr WL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Apr; 16(4):64, 66, 102. PubMed ID: 10125110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The interpretive guidelines: rote, reason or regulation?
Infante M
Contemp Longterm Care; 1991 Jul; 14(7):54, 78. PubMed ID: 10112233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
