451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303294)
1. Specialty differentials: are they needed in a physician payment system?
Reardon TR
Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10303294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The tinkering with RBRVS begins.
Kirchner M
Med Econ; 1989 Aug; 66(15):104-8, 110, 113-6 passim. PubMed ID: 10303734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The recommendations of the Physician Payment Review Commission.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1989 Apr; 320(17):1156-60. PubMed ID: 2496308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. RBRVS: four perspectives.
Hammons T; Graham R; Nelson A; Beahrs O
Iowa Med; 1989 Jun; 79(6):268-73. PubMed ID: 2661487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PPRC gives green light on physician payment reform.
Doherty RB
Internist; 1989; 30(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 10293614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining what's ahead for payment reform. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
Hsiao WC
Internist; 1989; 30(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 10293613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Specialty differentials, limited license practitioners, and Medicare's new fee schedule.
Soroka M; Barresi BJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Oct; 63(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 1430743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specialty differentials: are they needed in a physician payment system?
Reardon TR
J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 Mar; 76(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 2677217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicare payment reform. Recommendations of the Physician Payment Review Commission.
Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):18-9, 64. PubMed ID: 10303706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ASIM (American Society of Internal Medicine): balancing the need for specialty differentials.
Olson DR
Internist; 1989 Feb; 30(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Building a consensus for physician payment reform in Medicare. The Physician Payment Review Commission.
Lee PR; Ginsburg PB
West J Med; 1988 Sep; 149(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 3051680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical practice trends: a new system for paying Medicare fees to doctors--how much, how soon?
Golin CB
J Med Pract Manage; 1989; 4(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 10303245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the impact. The Medicare fee schedule.
Dempsey WS
Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician Payment Review Commission issues 1989 annual report.
Parks P
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 Aug; 74(8):8-12. PubMed ID: 10303703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The struggle over physician-payment reform.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1991 Sep; 325(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 1870663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new law on Medicare's payments to physicians.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1247-52. PubMed ID: 2183054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PhysPRC (Physician Payment Review Commission) report--the shape of things to come.
Doherty RB
Internist; 1988; 29(5):23-5, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10302524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Congress skeptical of recommendations to set Medicare fee scale for physicians.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1989 Mar; 19(12):20. PubMed ID: 10303320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Special report. On the front line of MD payment reform.
Ginsburg P
Part B News; 1989 Jul; 3(7):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10324945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Limit physician pay increases--PPRC.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1989 Jun; 19(23):17. PubMed ID: 10324934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
