These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303472)

  • 1. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers?
    Kotelchuck R
    Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Possible changes in store for PRO program.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Jul; 95(7):34. PubMed ID: 1408266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review of HMOs is here--or is it?
    Kirchner M
    Med Econ; 1988 Oct; 65(19):99-101, 104-5. PubMed ID: 10288977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PRO limited review creates controversy, heavy workload.
    Johnsson J
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():34-6. PubMed ID: 10302948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HCFA's close encounter with CQI.
    QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia.
    Brehm JG; Smith SM
    W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs.
    Cunningham R
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program.
    Roper WL
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HCFA's health care quality improvement program and physicians.
    Lapin PJ; Jencks SF
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 85(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 9782719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HMO review to switch to random samples.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Feb; 21(7):14. PubMed ID: 10109159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality improvement in medicare.
    Turkel RA
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Aug; 82(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 7561735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare and Medicaid programs; entities performing quality of care review of services provided by risk-basis health maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1987 Oct; 52(194):37454-8. PubMed ID: 10301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PRO review: strategies for HMOs.
    Siegel SH; Albritton PM; Thornhill MC
    GHAA J; 1988; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10302958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HCFA's peer review agencies turn collegial, but keep clout.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1996 Oct; 21(10):129-31. PubMed ID: 10161738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.