447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303483)
1. PROs to deny payment for substandard quality care.
Banach J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 10303483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Nov; 39(46):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10311364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Medicare regulations: denial of payment for substandard quality care and review of beneficiary complaints.
Cummins JR
Ky Hosp Mag; 1989; 6(4):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10304158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospitals anxious over payment denials for quality.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1987 Jun; 61(12):48, 53. PubMed ID: 3294566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PPS discharges: premature or appropriate?
Simmons SW
Mich Hosp; 1986 Feb; 22(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 10275635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PRO denial of payment for substandard care: a flawed federal initiative.
Blau ML
Healthspan; 1989 May; 6(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Payment Error Prevention Program (PEPP): reducing Medicare payment errors in prospective payment system hospitals.
Bitonte DA; Curry P; Butler P; Nowak MJ; Jean-Baptiste R; Feigenbaum RA
Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 May; 21(4):50-62. PubMed ID: 11378983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient psychiatric facilities. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2004 Nov; 69(219):66921-7015. PubMed ID: 15551495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
Weiser RR
Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA regulations will identify substandard care.
Robinson ML
Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):28. PubMed ID: 3053394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
Siegel SH
Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PROs in transition.
Bomberger I
Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10278605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA rethinking substandard care COBRA provision.
Firshein J
Hospitals; 1987 Feb; 61(3):23, 25-6. PubMed ID: 3542787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Under new management.
Bean HK
Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 10169732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare cuts' effects on quality worry health industry.
Iglehart JK; White JH
Health Prog; 1988 May; 69(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10302416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicare program; prospective payment system for long-term care hospitals: implementation and FY 2003 rates. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2002 Aug; 67(169):55953-56090. PubMed ID: 12211257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare establishes new payment system for long-term care hospitals.
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Sep; ():11-2. PubMed ID: 12420391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2001 Aug; 66(152):41315-430. PubMed ID: 11794307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare home health prospective payment system: reforms needed.
Caring; 2001 Nov; 20(11):42. PubMed ID: 11688423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
