136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10303508)
1. Perspectives. Medicaid HMOs: endangered species.
Traska MR
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 May; 43(18):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10303508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The big money in Medicaid. A boom in HMOs for the neediest leads to litigation, controversy--and lots of profits.
McLean B
Fortune; 2007 Jun; 155(12):97-8, 100, 102. PubMed ID: 17639994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives. Slowed growth signals changing environment for Medicaid HMOs.
Cunningham R
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1997 Jan; 51(1):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10163839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspectives. Medicaid HMOs: going gets tougher in new environment.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 Jan; 52(2):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10176249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicaid managed care helps states pay providers less; HMOs do negotiating.
Frye R
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1998 Nov; 16(11):11-2. PubMed ID: 10345067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicaid expansion: getting off the ground.
Defino T
HMO; 1995; 36(4):40-6. PubMed ID: 10166485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicaid HMOs struggle for viability; federal plan aims to ease the burden.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1990 Apr; 20(16):32. PubMed ID: 10106577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HMOs join to vie for contracts that move Calif. Medicaid patients to managed care.
de Lafuente D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(11):12. PubMed ID: 10132301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection bias in HMOs: a review of the evidence.
Hellinger FJ; Wong HS
Med Care Res Rev; 2000 Dec; 57(4):405-39. PubMed ID: 11105511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Providers could emerge as winners in Medicaid--but follow these 6 strategies.
Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Jun; 4(6):87-9. PubMed ID: 10180644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HHS pushing for Medicaid HMOs.
Firshein J
Hospitals; 1987 Feb; 61(4):22. PubMed ID: 3542794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Policy implications of risk selection in Medicare HMOs: is the federal payment rate too high?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 1996 Nov; (4):1-7. PubMed ID: 10539724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HMOs and Medicaid: how can the states sustain market interest?
Neuschler E
Bus Health; 1988 Jan; 5(3):50-1. PubMed ID: 10302131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interim findings from the Medicaid competition demonstrations.
Freund DA; Hurley RE; Paul J; Grubb C; Rossiter LF; Adamache KW
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1989; 10():153-81. PubMed ID: 10304285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HMOs selected for St. Louis Medicaid program.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1995 Apr; 25(16):16. PubMed ID: 10141521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives. For better or worse, Medicaid shakeout foreshadows aspects of M+C exodus.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 Nov; 52(45):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10339135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Privatized Medicaid ventures find success.
Snow C
Mod Healthc; 1996 Mar; 26(10):126, 128. PubMed ID: 10156317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of Medicaid HMOs on spending and health outcomes.
Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health; 2002-2003 Winter; (2):4. PubMed ID: 15141681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The S/HMO demonstration: policy implications for long term care in HMOs.
Greenlick MR; Nonnenkamp LL; Gruenberg L; Leutz W; Lamb S
Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1988; 7(3):15-24. PubMed ID: 10312664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical underwriting. Staying ahead of the competition.
Maurer WJ
Group Pract J; 1990; 39(2):49-50, 53. PubMed ID: 10105263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
